Eye Candy

Whats the title of the movie?

The first episode of The Saint (1962).
Shirley Eaton stands out in it, other than that the series seems to be very British/Anglo/....
What it does have is this playful vibe but that's present in most old movies, it's so lala in my impression. Very 'Xt' and slave morality and cucky but I am beginning to repeat myself.

It is chivalry in its innocent and naive sense coupled with excessive manners and kindness towards people who deserve none which ultimately does not matter because right off the bat you know nothing cruel or truly bad would happen anyway. I don't mind this sort of underlying things that I disagree with since the time of its ideological impact is over and I simply enjoy watching good looking, well dressed white people speak fluent, old English(even if American) acting in a manner that resembled an old Europe I remember from having a chance to speak to some older generations of academics and soldiers in Poland and other less direct ways of accessing the past of the continent.

The Saint is pretty much the same character which Roger Moore will also portray in his Bond movies.
It's the same character he pretty much always portrays in all his movies from what I have seen.
There are two kinds of actors, those who play different characters(roles) and those who pretty much always play the same character(roles).

The thing about this cuck mentality is that it doesn't extend to other European men, but it extends to women, the poor, the lost, basically the supposedly weak, you gotta cuck yourself for them.
Women have this policing among themselves for any behaviour they don't like. For example, in earlier times being a floozy. Or in more modern days, not being a feminist, being a housewife with a husband, lol.
This is kind of similar for those cuckoo men. They also police among themselves in that way, demanding that you cuck yourself as well.

I think a cuck is always also cucking someone else, not only himself.
It's like the fast runner who suggests that all disputes should be settled by who can run the fastest.
The willing cuck demanding to settle everything by who can cuck the hardest.


As an example -
There is a scene in one episode where a wife conspires with her secret lover to rob her husband, who gets killed which as we learn is something she probably anticipated and was willing to go along with anyway.
Either way, eventually they get caught and Roger Moore asks an inspector what will happen to the woman. He answers that the law will probably be lenient because it was her weakness which motivated her.
Her weakness...

Extrapolating from this, it's not surprising how things are going today. The 'weak' have become so numerous and so emboldened that this kind of mindset which protects weakness for the sake of being weak is threatening to overthrow the social cuckoo order as well.

Hate.

Awwwwww

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

More good photos I took last summer. (Eye have pointed ears like an elf).

Is Lyssa still here? I wonder why that Gay boy doesn't post photos?

Turns out (truer than fiction. I found out...) that gay (yes GAY men) are definitely following me. Jealous of me. Trying to win the heart of Satyr (consider THAT) and pretending to like posting here on the forums. As a result, a woman, specifically to get Satyr attracted to him.

Apparently, gay men are very....very. Jealous. of. me.

And obviously my fantastic thinking and writing skills. My gifts, if you will.

For attracting men etc.

They must have found these good qualities attractive themselves, and wanted to take over the forum here with Satyr, masquerading as a woman (Lyssa). And he even appears to be a woman, as he is a transgender gay. Who will turn back to a man when his business here is over.

So sorry to inform you all of this.

There IS gay conspiracy. It is real. I have gay followers. And they did take over this forum.

Again, no other reason than that I have excellent writing skills and am superb at interaction with men. This is seemingly irresistible to them, especially in a young girl. Again, sorry for the confusion.

I hate gay men.

Where is Erik?

The feminization of man creates a fear and insecurity, this fear then transforms into hatred towards gay men as your mind equates the feminine male to being automatically gay, not to mention it's a little bit difficult to use your pussy power to access resources of a real gay man...so your hatred is understandable relative to your struggle to survive..

Feminization makes girls envious and needy.

Collateral effect to the feminization of men, or over feminization of women, or both?

Collateral effect....so called masculinization of women, linked to feminization of men...in addition to a more prissiness, delicacy, infantile spirit, cultivated in girlie girls.
Looking for a daddy, to remain little princesses, and only finding a faceless state, an institution, to fit the role.

The first think it is expected that women are equal to men, and step into the void left by male emasculation, only to find they cannot compete with the highest, but only with the mediocre.
That's when they begin to envy, and to feel dissatisfaction with what they've become, and with what they've settled for, in the course of their self-deceit.

They are starting to marry themselves now because of it.

Generations of confused, quiet desperation, being born, as we speak.

Perhaps that desperation will become a little louder over time.

Has it not already increasing in volume?
Have you not heard the cries of shrill hysterics, and booming insanity?

I think it increases and decreases in volume depending upon the nature of the desperation.

Need/Desire waxes and wanes, to the metabolic rhythms, fine tuned by sun/moon cycles and seasonal shifts.

This is what I like:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Too skinny....this is what I like....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]




[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]




[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

That I would show faces and you would show bodies when speaking of what we like already indicates our hierarchy of priorities is different.

I like the curvy bodies on your girls, especially nicely shaped asses (and not morbidly big like in sheboons), faces, where I can see them, not so much. I prefer the faces of my girls. Breast are not all that important to me.

Also, speaking of aesthetic preferences, I've always found black and generally darker hair to look great on men, but very unattractive in women. On women, I've always liked lighter hair colors - blonde/light brown, but on men light hair looks kind of... feminine.

So if I had kids I'd want the male kid to have dark hair and the female kid to have light hair, which would put me in an awkward position when picking a partner. Though brown hair looks decent on everybody.

I also dislike darker skin tones, and never understood tanning. I don't wanna look like some nigger or gypsy.

This is my male aesthetic ideal - how I'd want to look/my offspring to look, no homo (seriously):

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I always see ass first, face second.
I have my priorities.
I prefer dark hair.

If there was no mouth....better.
A mute, with a nice ass.

Pixies are for pics...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]







Roundness indicates balance.
Angular forms indicate imbalance.
Women like angular because such men are more aggressive, risk-takers, risk-takers, fueled by testosterone.
Roundness is symmetry....in females it means fertility, and a calm demeanour.
Less testosterone.
More feminine.

A round ass implies hips and waist ratio....breasts are less important.
A woman can have nice breasts and be like a box.

Women's mouths are a great thing too, come on. And in.

And the voice is merely a tool - it can be used for good (moaning, communicating important information, asking how she can please her master) and evil (disobedience, nagging, talking back, insults). It is up to her master to teach her this difference between good and evil.

Also, ideal male physique:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

AutSider wrote:

Also, ideal male physique:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

And... real male physique:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

AutSider wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

That's definitely an admixture of mediterranean and someone with more lighter features and high forehead...Light blue eyes mean less "purity", dark blue eyes have more pigment so that's how you recognize a pure nordic, just like a blonde person with a cotton color is less pure and ones with golden hair. All green eyes are an admixture.

autsider wrote:

That I would show faces and you would show bodies when speaking of what we like already indicates our hierarchy of priorities is different.

I like the curvy bodies on your girls, especially nicely shaped asses (and not morbidly big like in sheboons), faces, where I can see them, not so much. I prefer the faces of my girls. Breast are not all that important to me.

Also, speaking of aesthetic preferences, I've always found black and generally darker hair to look great on men, but very unattractive in women. On women, I've always liked lighter hair colors - blonde/light brown, but on men light hair looks kind of... feminine.

So if I had kids I'd want the male kid to have dark hair and the female kid to have light hair, which would put me in an awkward position when picking a partner. Though brown hair looks decent on everybody.

I also dislike darker skin tones, and never understood tanning. I don't wanna look like some nigger or gypsy.

I like tan, but tan doesn't change your race it enhances your features if you are very light skinned and myself have skin that can take sun (since my ancestors come probably from some Russian steppe's) and is greasy so it's really good for me to cure acne.

I think many of these types are attractive in their own way, but the problem is that usually the skull and features puts the person into a certain average so I couldn't simply get along with certain types of skulls, there is no chemistry

Dolichopephaly is what I consider an Aryan feature, and also I can get along better with people with longer skulls than those who are limited in intelligence/understanding

Quote :

A Caucasian forehead is around 70-75mm in height. A Nordic and Dinaric high scull around 80-90mm.....(You measure from above nasal root/Cranium floor to above your frontal lopes), ...Caucasian Head height or Head vault: is normally around 145mm and on Nordics on circa 165mm. (Head height, is the length from the middle ear hole - to the top of the head)

With extreme Dolichopephaly it can even be longer than that

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]