Movie Scenes

"He asked me why it was important for me to come here... I told him: 'I love you.' Did I ever tell you?"

Ahhh yes, the glory days...

Even though it's not a perfect show, I like dexter a lot.

I like this interpretation, though I just checked out his page for other movie analysis, but they aren't free, what a douche

Cry yourselves to sleep, eat your donuts, fuck the fuck out of the definition; the cleansing wave against Modernity and Mongrelism is coming.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhFudwAB9Y0

Primal, raw, barbaric masculinity... Azog the Defiler:



Also, why not:



EDIT: haha, when I think about it Dragon Ball is really childish. Most transformations/power ups are achieved by characters experiencing emotional distress and throwing tantrums, like children, which then makes them stronger somehow. But there is also a realistic side to it, like how saiyans get stronger each time they fight and recover which is similar to how muscles get stronger when they're torn apart and repaired.

Strength is the only thing that matters. Everything else is a delusion for the weak.

How movies make the viewer cry. The method is Intimate/Happy Scene+Music A, then Sad Scene+Music A.

Manipulation has become a multi-sensory science.
Specific tones, connecting to images, producing an automatic reaction.

Bernays is the one who applied his uncle Freud's insights into human sexuality, the most primal instinct, after anxiety/fear, that is a means of coping with it.
Lust/Love are later evolved sensations/emotions, just as heterosexual reproduction is an advancement to single-cell division.
A mechanism had to evolve to deal with what was already present and automated as fight/flight.
If it hadn't heterosexual reproduction would be impossible.
This evolved method, starting as lust, then developed into what we call love...a mechanism that bonds mother to helpless offspring, and then individual organism to herd.
We can imagine that organism had no sense of self when the process began, so there was not much to overcome for bonding to become a sense of identifying with other, or with the group.

Lust/Love are the themes of Modern art.
That's all you see in music, movies, all the arts.
It sells.
Berany's used it to market cigarette use to females, by associating with the penis, in a time where females were being manipulated to think they were the equals to males, when males began to become obsolete due to technological advancements.

Female's are particularly prone to being manipulated by lust/love, due to their reproductive role, and their prolonged dependence on the group, to survive, during gestation and weening.
Feminization is evident in art.
Every movies selling the same ideals, using the same mechanisms - fear, and its antidote love, and lust, and its antidote pleasure.
Pavlovian methods of manipulation.
The association of a sound with an event, or a behavior.  
This results in imprinting, the most primal form of bonding...found in birds that upon emerging form the egg immediately follow the first organism they see, and that does not eat them.

In humans we see the reactions to particular words, after decades of "training".
The average degenerate, does not know why it believes what it believes, because it's ingrained after years of imprinting.
He feels positive/negative sensations/emotions, triggered by sounds, or the sharing of sound into words, or with particular images, triggering feelings.
Then they try to validate their sensation, and seek it in ways already provided to them.
Most do not know why they believe specific things having to do with specific ideas, they just do, and must explain why.
This is Top<>Down thinking, a quintessentially Nihilistic marker.
Brain floods with triggered emotions, sensations, images, that must be connected to reality.
The emotions are in regards to experiences not their own - acquired through movies as second-hand experiences they then associate with their own past.
The mind can forget traumatic events, or recall memories not its own.

Modern Nihilists are obsessed with the idea that all is subjective and a social construct because this is THEIR Utopian ideal: a world where men, decide, despite nature, what ideals to live by, erasing or usurping all past nurturing.
Social engineering IS their saving grace, God's will, where god means sanctified humanity.
They must erase minds, because tabula rasa has proven to be another one of those myths they naively bought into, because it satisfied their deepest desires and and comforted their deepest anxieties.

If humans were so special and independent form nature,m form their own past, then politics, psychology and more evidently marketing, as Bernay's applied it, would be a failure, and how it has been applied in modern politics would be inconsequential.
Not the stars and their configurations, or fee-will, as omnipotent force shaping humanity, nor determinism, as the chains man to his past...but a degree, a ceaseless (inter)action of what has been determined, in reaction to what is ongoing.
To gain more control over what has already been determined and is automatically applied, whether you like it or not, demands a level of self-knowledge, acceptance, and will, most moderns fail to posses, primarily because they deny the existence of human nature, making it ironic as well as pathetic.

Irony of ironies, that those most in denial of a determined past, of nature, are the ones most dominated by it - those declaring their own dominating free-will, are the ones who lack it all the more.
The explanation is simple, but when you are a superficial simpleton, it eludes you.
As a consequence paradox, conundrums, contradictions, perplex the modern mind, forever trying to make sense of their psychotic retardation.
Faith, feminine and other mystique, magic, contradiction itself, is used as a means of comforting self, and remaining as comfortably confused as possible....an easy affair when idiocy is more controllable, and so the system protects it, s a matter of its own survival.
Why would a farmer want to instill pride, and a sense of independence to his domesticated animals, and his pets?
Why would he wish for them to be survivors, and not afraid of the world beyond his fences and outside his barns?

Yes, that appears to be the simple methods of mind control: label (associate) a behavior and then attack the label repeatedly. In a string of associations and repetitions, one can try to gradually manipulate the behavior of their target. In the world, cooperation is powerful and in the realm of cooperation, the Word is powerful. Control the language and control the cooperation, control that and control its power. In a way, there's power in privacy because it is what is unsaid - it is not yet labeled and cannot be simply laibeled through the simple process of word associations which form an us/them distinction or evil/good simplification - which is part of the power of cooperation. Massive action by many individuals for/against a pattern.

It comes with the territory that there will be opportunists in every "movement" and the new white nationalist one is without exception. Constant attempts at reigning in and "exposing" the spiritual nature of the anarchist force of a cartoon Pepe frog, which laughs at any attempt to take it seriously. The amphibian which affirms all its stereotypes.

There is a story about how a princess made the frog become a prince. The original says she threw the frog at the wall, not that she kissed it. However, in order to throw the frog at the wall, she must first pick it up and acknowledge it exists. Once it is acknowledged, even by its being thrown, it turns into a handsome prince. It's an apt analogy now, since European men are politically propagandized as "not existing" - no men exist (gender roles are fiction) and no whiteness exists (race is fiction). That they take on the image of a cartoon frog (which when taken seriously by anyone, they are seen as ridiculous) in relation to the cultural history of Europeans demonstrated by that story, it's an interesting coincidence.

Young European women must first pick up the frog, though. If they keep pretending it doesn't exist or they get other men to throw out the frog, their beautiful prince will never come.

Control Hollywood and you control the hearts and minds of the mediocre, majority.
Who controls Hollywood?
Now they are reinventing mythology by going back to childish comic book representations.
Green Lantern is gay....Thor will be a woman...Captain America will be black....
Star Wars will introduce a female lead.
Kick-ass female "warriors" beating up men, twice their size.

Every few years another Holocaust revival film, to not let us forget what the Nazis did....in other words keeping the Germans ashamed and down.
Only recently have they remembered there was an Armenian holocaust, in preparation for some kind of Turkish fragmentation, to introduce the Kurds in the region.
Borne Identity about some rogue secret agent, who is clenching up American secret services...a noble rebel ridding the service of its bad elements.
A post Snowden whistle-blower....born again, as it were. Born again CIA. The agency is good, if not for the few bad apples, Bourne is dealing with one at a time.
Only he's not exposing American empire, but cleansing it of the part that make all the atrocities happen.

Can't tell anymore who is trying to chew on who...

And this is why you take out the enemy while you can. Don't know what the big guy was supposed to say as I don't watch the game of thrones, and it doesn't matter.

At least the smaller dude should have stood behind his head, where he can't be tripped.

Few things are more despicable than somebody who starts a fight, but then asks for mercy and demands the one they are attacking to go easy on them... pathetic.

My kind of romance: